SFDR, EU Taxonomy and the challenges for ETFs

Why there is a long way to go for ESG ETFs

a man in a suit

The structural trend towards environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing has been underway in Europe for some years now. ESG funds in Europe have multiplied year-on-year inflows over the past five years. ETFs have increasingly adapted to this trend and have contributed to some of the most successful ESG fund launches over the past few years.

In parallel to this investor-led trend, the EU has adopted measures as part of its EU Action Plan on Sustainable Finance designed to make sustainability considerations an integral part of financial policy to support the European Green Deal and channel private investment towards the transition to a climate-neutral economy.

Two key measures adopted by the EU which ETF issuers and their managers will have been grappling with over the past two years are the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulations (SFDR) and the Taxonomy Regulation.

SFDR is intended to provide harmonised rules on transparency in relation to the provision of sustainability-related information for financial products which include UCITS and therefore European ETFs.

SFDR also introduced additional disclosure requirements which apply to certain types of funds with a specific ESG focus. These are the so-called “light green” Article 8 funds that promote environmental or social characteristics and so-called “dark green” Article 9 funds which have sustainable investment or reduction in carbon emissions as their objective.

ETF issuers will have updated their prospectuses to include the relevant disclosures by the implementation date for the level 1 measures under SFDR of 10 March 2021. The implementation date for more detailed level 2 measures has been delayed until 1 January 2023.

The Taxonomy Regulation is intended to provide a unified classification system for environmentally sustainable economic activities and thereby reduce the risk of “greenwashing”. It introduced a common language and clear definition of what is considered to be sustainable. The level 1 requirements under the Taxonomy Regulation were required to be implemented by 1 January 2022 and again issuers of ETFs would have updated their prospectuses to include the relevant taxonomy-related disclosures.

The introduction of SFDR classification system has driven significant inflows towards funds classified as Article 8 or Article 9 with ESG ETFs, in particular, experiencing significant growth in 2020 with around 200 new ESG ETFs established during that period.

In addition to new ESG ETFs, many European asset managers have undergone significant repurposing exercises to upgrade existing ETFs and, in most cases, the indices being tracked by those ETFs to introduce ESG screens or characteristics to be classified under Article 8 or 9.

While the inflows to ESG products and the arrival of a harmonized classification regime may be good news from an asset raising perspective, there are a number of challenges that the managers of Article 8 and 9 ETFs are facing in meeting these new obligations.

In particular, the taxonomy requires Article 8 and 9 products, where applicable, to disclose how and to what extent their underlying investments are in economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable under the taxonomy.

Providing this quantitative disclosure is reliant on data available from investee companies. As the sub-set of investee companies in the scope of the relevant taxonomy reporting requirements are not required to provide this information until 1 January 2023 at the earliest, there will be insufficient data available to Article 8 and 9 ETFs to provide this level of quantitative disclosure.

This has resulted in most managers of Article 8 or 9 ETFs, where applicable, either explaining why they could not provide a quantitative disclosure or, for now, disclosing 0% alignment of their investments with the taxonomy regulation. Subject to any clarification from EU regulators over the intervening period, this will continue to be a challenge for ESG ETFs over the coming year.

Stephen Carson is a partner at A&L Goodbody

This article first appeared in ETF Insider, ETF Stream's monthly ETF magazine for professional investors in Europe. To access the full issue, click here.

Related articles


No ETFs to show.