A burgeoning segment of the industry, combining active management and the ETF wrapper, has been frowned upon by some who see it at odds with the passive, rules-based approach on which ETFs built their reputation. Despite consecutive S&P Dow Jones Indices SPIVA scorecards illustrating active strategies have struggled to outperform their benchmarks in many exposures, more than half of professional, half of the European ETF buyers interviewed by Brown Brothers Harriman in 2021 said they plan to increase their allocation to these products. The active-passive debate on performance and fees continues without sign of abating.
NEWS & FEATURES
ESMA: Active fund outperformance in Europe marginal and short-lived during COVID-19 volatility
Morningstar downgrades ARKK ETF to ‘negative’ stance and brands Wood’s approach a ‘liability’
The beauty of active ETFs in times of uncertainty
We are living in a polycrisis. One crisis following the next, many of which are closely or loosely connected – and their effects overlap and even amplify in some cases. Given this backdrop, ETF selection is more important than ever. Investors need to decide whether they want to track market-cap-based indices or add a little alpha to their “passive” building blocks.
Inception or conception? ETFs and index selection
Fidelity International on index selection
Conversational alpha: This is not your parents’ EV market
Capturing the mobility megatrend still in its early stages